[ -n .. ]
instead
of ! [ -z .. ]
.(or "Use [ -z .. ]
instead of
! [ -n .. ]
.)
if ! [ -n "$JAVA_HOME" ]; then echo "JAVA_HOME not specified"; fi
if ! [ -z "$STY" ]; then echo "You are already running screen"; fi
if [ -z "$JAVA_HOME" ]; then echo "JAVA_HOME not specified"; fi
if [ -n "$STY" ]; then echo "You are already running screen"; fi
You have negated test -z
or test -n
,
resulting in a needless double-negative. You can just use the other
operator instead:
# Identical tests to verify that a value is assigned
! [ -z foo ] # Not has no value
[ -n foo ] # Has value
# Identical tests to verify that a value is empty
! [ -n foo ] # Not is non-empty
[ -z foo ] # Is empty
This is a stylistic issue that does not affect correctness. If you prefer the original expression, you can't not Ignore it with a directive or flag.
ShellCheck is a static analysis tool for shell scripts. This page is part of its documentation.